PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF MEDICAL LABORATORY PROFESSIONALS’ ON MALARIA MICROSCOPY, AFAR REGIONAL STATE, NORTH-EAST ETHIOPIA, 2017
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Abstract
Introduction: Light microscopy is a gold standard method to malaria diagnosis. The
effectiveness of malaria microscopy depends on maintaining a high level of staff performance.
The aim of this study is to evaluate performance of laboratory professionals working in Health
Facility Laboratories of Afar Region on malaria microscopy through proficiency slides and
factors influencing their performance.
Method: We implemented institution based cross sectional study. We measured the performance
of each laboratory professionals with 23 panel malaria slides. Microscopists achieving ≥90%
sensitivity and ≥80% specificity and 95% Plasmodium falciparum detection (if present) were
good performer otherwise poor performer. We collected data from November 13 to December
26, 2017 and entered to Epi Info version 7 and analyzed by SPSS version 21. We equated
associated factor with performance through binary logistic regression. Odds ratio, p-value and
95% confidence interval was used to test association.
Result: Of the total 119 laboratory professionals working in Afar Region 99 (83.2%)
professionals participated on this research. Of the total participants only 48(48.5%) not fulfilled
the criteria to diagnose malaria at periphery level. Of total 2277 distributed slides, 1683(73.9%)
correctly read and of 99 low load Plasmodium Vivax species 22(22.2%) slides correctly read.
The overall Sensitivity and specificity was 86.7% (Kappa=0.73). Laboratory professionals
trained malaria microscopy had better performance than not trained [AOR]=3.894, CI=1.329
11.410. Laboratory professionals with good theoretical knowledge had good performance than
had poor theoretical knowledge. (AOR=4.067, CI=1.327-12.469, P=0.014). Laboratory
professionals with less than 2 year experience had poor performance than those have more than 5
year experience (AOR=0.124, CI=0.030-0.51 1.943).
Conclusion and recommendation: Performance of laboratory professionals working in Afar
region on malaria diagnosis under light microscopy was poor and not sufficiently skilled to
detect the low density parasitaemia that help to malaria elimination program. Providing training
and regular competence evaluation may improve their performance.