Assessing Pediatric Index of Mortality2 Score and Factors Affecting Outcome of Patients Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit in SPHMMC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 2016 to 2019
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Mortality reduction is the fundamental aim of a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit
(PICU). Pediatric Index of Mortality2 (PIM2) is one of mortality scoring methods which can be
used to predict mortality, to assess quality of care and to determine severity of illness in pediatric
intensive care units (PICUs). Despite PIM2 is regarded to be a better tool, its use has not been well
validated in Ethiopia. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicablity of PIM2 score in
predicting mortality in a tertiary care pediatric ICU and to assess associated factors in predicting
mortality.
Method: A health institution based cross sectional study was conducted on 282 PICU admitted
children to SPHMMC from 2016 to 2019. An adopted checklist was used to collect data from
patient records from July 01-30, 2019. Data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. The
predictive ability of PIM2 score for patient mortality was analyzed using Reciver Operative
Characteristics (ROC) curve and the corresponding sensitivity and specificity of the PIM2 model
was calculated. Multiple binary logistic regression was conducted and P-value <0.05 was
considered statistically significant.
Results: A total of 282 patients were included in this study. The predicted mortality by PIM2 score
was 11.8% (n=34) while the observed mortality was 39.7% (n=112). Neurological diseases
contributed to 33.0% mortality followed by cardiac 14.3% and renal diseases 13.4%. PIM2 score
discriminated well between death and survival with area under receiver operating characteristic
curve 0.86 (95%CI 0.82 to 0.91) and with sensitivity of 75% and specificity 83.5%. Significant
statistical association with mortality was seen in children who required mechanical ventilation
Adjusted Odd’s Ratio (AOR) 9.2 (95%CI 2.65 to 31.9), children with high risk diagnosis (AOR
8.4 (95%CI 4.17 to 16.8) and in those with dilated pupils at admission AOR 9.4 (95%CI 1.37 to
64.5).
Conclusion: PIM2 model has a good discriminatory power, it discriminated well between
survivors and death at PICU and therefore is recommended for routine use in clinical practice.
Mortality was more likely in children who required mechanical ventilation at admission, have a
high risk diagnosis and dilated pupils.
Key words: Pediatric index of mortality children, mortality, PICU